In what has become somewhat of an annual ritual in the digital music business, the music labels are again complaining about the $.99 price point for tracks on Apple's iTunes digital music service (the other download services aren't big enough to matter and would have to follow whatever Apple does)- good NYT article about it here. Having lived through this discussion more times than I would like to remember, my first thought was that I was glad not to have to go through it again, but let's look at the primary issue.
The core disagreement is that labels feel that flat rate pricing doesn't capture enough margin for those hot tracks where users would pay more. Numerous studies will be trotted out, showing that consumers will pay up to $2-3 for hot singles, so the labels are giving up substantial margin by wholesaling all tracks at $.70-75. Then they will point to ring tones where pricing is 2-3x higher, and that's not even for the whole track or even the song itself in case of polyphonic ringtones. Finally they will offer up a lower price point which will be added to the equation so that it doesn't look just like a price increase - the goal is probably a $.50-$.75 price point for deep catalog/less desirable tracks, $.99 for the majority of music, and $1.49-$1.99 for more popular tracks, the overall algorithm to be determined in some TBD way.
It's an interesting point - in most markets you see differential pricing along the life cycle of the product - e.g. a movie starts at $9 in a theater and then goes down the price curve (VOD, DVD, Pay Cable, etc.) until it reaches free in the broadcast market. Video game consoles are introduced at $300+ price points, and gradually move down to a $99 price point towards the end of the 7 year cycle. And everyone should be incented to generate additional margin, so why shouldn't the service providers go right along with this theory?
The reason is that most service providers I know (including Listen.com before our purchase by Real) have done their own price elasticity studies which show that digital download purchases are utterly price elastic when measured over a period of time across a large group of consumers - that means that demand for the product is closely related to the price - increasing the price will actually drive down revenue since fewer people purchase the product, while decreasing the price actually increases the overall revenue since many more people purchase the product, more than making up for the lower price per unit.
I have no doubt that if you picked one hot track, and polled users in isolation to ask them if they would pay more than $.99 for that track, many would tell you yes. But the studies show that when you measure behavior across a longer period of time, everyone is better off with lower prices for music downloads, with $.50 being actually the magic number, especially for a business which has NO hard cost of goods outside of artist royalties, which are almost never on a fixed basis so they will decrease with the price. The explosive growth of DVD sales are a classic example of this - DVDs used to cost $90+ and very few were sold outside of rental stores. Once the price dropped to the $20 range, the number of retail outlets exploded, consumer demand sky rocketed, and DVD sales became the most profitable part of movie studios.
Admittedly, there are other parts to this discussion, such as the operational difficulty of frequently changing prices (one label actually once proposed changing it on a weekly basis according to how many radio spins the track had recorded the previous week - no joke), the confusion in the market place with multiple price points, the seeming amnesia about the continuing massive piracy issue, the bitterness the labels feel about Apple's iPod profits and growing digital market power, channel conflict pricing issues with physical retail, label concern about "lowering the value of music", label unhappiness that the publishers statutory rate would not go down with the price decrease, etc - but it really comes down to one point - is digital music price elastic and if so, by how much?
"It may be instructive to look at the pricing model of DVDs for insight into what has happened in the CD market. In case you were unaware, the film/TV industry uses a very different pricing strategy than the music biz.
Studios release far less product each year then the labels, with major film releases numbering in the 100s versus 25,000 or so annual CD releases.
Films have a model where they typically are released from the highest revenue generator down to the lowest. Another way to describe that progression is a dynamic pricing structure going from highest paying users to lowest. Starting with theatrical release (movie theatres), moving next to pay-per-view, and than premium cable (i.e, HBO). After the premium cable run has begun (or ends) is when typically DVDs get released for sale (or rental) to the public. Eventually, movies make their way to basic cable, and lastly, to broadcast TV. (Somewhere in the middle is overseas release, but for our purposes, that's more of a parallel track).
DVD sales do not rely on a static pricing model. They are initially released at a price point consistent with expected demand. After a short period of time, prices drop, and in some cases, significantly.
Posted by: barry Ritholtz | August 29, 2005 at 07:06 PM
What an instructive post, but I think in a different way.
Extrefox
Posted by: othemsthesk | January 05, 2008 at 10:00 AM
Thanks for your project. I like this site. KEEP IT UP..o
Posted by: Julia | January 03, 2009 at 08:03 PM
I love to explore I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don’t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.
Posted by: karaoke machine | January 13, 2010 at 04:03 AM
To make good use of life one should have in youth the experience of advanced years, and in old age the vigor of youth.
Posted by: nike shox clearance | July 20, 2011 at 01:39 AM
i think you have a great site here... today was my first time coming here..
Posted by: nicki minaj tickets | July 21, 2011 at 12:33 AM
It is so lucky to read your blog,it is full of useful message.I wish we both can do better in the future
Posted by: Oakley Sunglasses | July 21, 2011 at 01:46 AM
Azt akarta, hogy többet tudjon konkrét témákban, de nem sok websites segítene nekem, ki tájékoztatása rám, ahogy vártam. Ez maradt meg sok kérdést, de elolvasása után a cikk, kaptam választ minden kérdésemre. Túl jó haver!
Posted by: Generic Drugs Exporter | July 25, 2011 at 05:06 AM
I don’t say much about articles often, but your article was begging me to say something. Your information is intelligent. Thank you for writing this.
Posted by: Pandora Jewellery | July 31, 2011 at 06:13 PM
Nice Article, I appreciate your writing skills, keeps on posting.
Posted by: Rummy Card game | August 02, 2011 at 11:15 PM
Sea Niza a visitar su blog una vez más, han pasado meses para mí. Así este artículo que he estado esperando por mucho tiempo con. Necesito este artículo completar esta tarea en el colegio, y tiene tema de Sam con su artículo. Gracias, la participación de grandes.
Posted by: Buy Geodon Online | August 09, 2011 at 12:33 AM
Nautin todella Reding viestejäsi koska olen oppia paljon niistä. Olen myös avartamaan ajattelua niin pitkälle kuin mitä voin käyttää ja tehdä asioita
Rate translation
Posted by: Sildenafil Citrate | August 10, 2011 at 12:20 AM
I '
m lieta questa pagina straordinaria carità, questa è una forma di materia che sostengo, ma vede day.We out 'era spesso sentito ultimamente di voler sul vostro sito web a destra subito dopoHey,
Great idea, I would like to read your post every day,
Posted by: Rhinocort 200MDI | August 10, 2011 at 12:42 AM
Thank you for your article.It is good.
Posted by: HVAC parts | August 10, 2011 at 02:02 AM
Some men would rather pursue happiness than obtain it. Do you agree?
Posted by: Crescent Processing Company | August 10, 2011 at 07:26 AM
Do you agree?Gracias, la participación de grandes.
Posted by: Buy Geodon Online | Augu
Posted by: NFL | August 21, 2011 at 05:40 PM
Necesito este artículo completar esta tarea en el colegio, y tiene tema de Sam con su artículo. Gracias, la participación de grandes.
Posted by: iPhone App Developer | August 22, 2011 at 12:15 AM
I think a portion should go to the deficit, however some of it should go to student athletes in the form of summer jobs, etc, etc.
Posted by: cheap Coogi Clothing | August 28, 2011 at 07:20 PM
I came to your article from another article and am really interested in this learning about this, I feel strongly about information and love learning more on this. If possible, as you gain expertise, It is extremely helpful for me. would you mind updating your blog with more information?
Posted by: christian louboutin knockoffs | August 31, 2011 at 08:26 PM
I have no words to express how useful your blog was to me in completing my job work successful. Thanks a lot.
Posted by: RPG Game Developer | September 19, 2011 at 11:39 PM